Re-run failed tests via API (Suitest Network API)
complete
b
bogdan.jakovljevic
We want to be able to re-run failed tests.
Our suggestion for a quick solution is to provide us an API to create "on the fly" new test pack with failed tests only and to re-run brand new test pack.
Log In
M
Martin Ceska
complete
For more information, please take a look at the following page in our User Docs - https://suite.st/docs/running-test-cases/re-executing-failed-tests/.
M
Martin Ceska
in progress
M
Martin Ceska
planned
M
Martin Ceska
Hi all voters,
When a test-pack is executed on more than 1 device, re-run would execute the failed tests on all of them (to make sure that new changes did not break behavior on devices where the test was not failing before).
Please let me know if there are any objections to that.
Kind regards,
Martin
M
Martin Ceska
Merged in a post:
Automatically re-run failed tests in a test pack
A
ANZ Shared
Tests inside test packs often fail for a variety of random reasons, such as a button input not registering, or the device being a bit slow to respond, or a random temporary network dropout. For this reason, a QA person often needs to keep an eye on the tests as they are running, and then manually re-run the failed tests. In most cases, the tests pass on a second run.
It would be a big time saver if, when executing a test pack, there was an option to tell Suitest to automatically retry a failed test up to x number of times. In this way, the QA person can confidently leave the test packs to execute without needing to constantly check them due to fear of a random failure from an external factor.
This is a similar request to https://roadmap.suite.st/feature-requests/p/able-to-rerun-failed-test-cases-only except it is requesting a feature of the re-run of a failed test to happen automatically as the user specifies, so if that feature is already on the roadmap it would be great if you could add this to it at the same time.
M
Martin Ceska
M
Martin Ceska
under review
M
Martin Ceska
Hi Bogdan,
Thank you for your feature request. We will discuss it internally and then let you know about the outcome.
Martin
G
Gerry Paneda
any updates?
Q
QA Engineer
Hello Gerry. Thanks for the feedback. We already have this feature in our backlog. We'll consider your feedback during our next re-prioritization session.
Load More
→